Discussion Forum (Archived)
Guest
One of the newest members of our astronomy club (and one of the youngest) has been sending me emails that often include cryptic acronyms and abbreviations requiring a visit to this helpful website. I'd never use things like that in a formal email to a client, but in casual emails to friends and family, I often use some of the more commonly known myself [IMHO, LOL, :), etc.]. Those have been around since the early days when "chat rooms" went by the name of "CB Simulator" ca. 1980s. For those too young to recall, the "CB" stands for "citizens band" which was a radio communication system. I think it's still popular with long-haul truckers.
Now I've gone on record many times saying I don't mind the language evolving, especially casual language. But this recent trend bothers me. Many of these abbreviations and acronyms have multiple meanings, and it's not always obvious from context which meaning is implied. Scan through the (long) list on that link and you'll see what I'm talking about.
I've even had people say (in words) "BRB" when, for example, they need to excuse themself to use the restroom. Likewise "IMHO."
So I won't ask you (the forum members) if you've seen this trend, because I'm virtually certain you have. My question here is how you feel about it, and how it's affecting the language. Personally, I don't like it. It's starting to make me feel like an "outsider" with my own first language.
While at my first career job and still finishing up my PhD, I was taught that it was the writer's job to make his writing clear to the reader. Therefore, if the acronym is not clear (I hope PhD is), it is the writer's responsibility to write out an acronym on its first occurrence. I think this is a good rule for both formal and informal writing. The intended acronym's meaning is then clear. If the writer refuses, he cannot complain about any resulting miscommunication. (I am sending this with LOL since the topic is too serious to LOL.)
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Grant Barrett
1 Guest(s)