Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

And, in honor of all of us who love to use the pluperfect at every opportunity, it could also have been "had" for a seven-fold repeat.

When John and Mary compared test results, John, where Mary had "had had," had "had": "had had" received a better grade from the instructor.

I am assuming that expletives are excluded. In Four Weddings and a Funeral, for example, in the church narthex … .

Ron Draney said:

The sentence in question was probably:

I said that, "that 'that' that that man wrote should have been underlined."

An explanation can be found at http://www.increasebrainpower.com/that-riddle.html.

Once you've managed to wrap your head around that train-wreck of a sentence, see what you can do with:

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo.

It is grammatical, and it doesn't require any other punctuation.

In this case, Wikipedia can serve as an acceptable reference:

!!! SPOILER ALERT !!!
Bullafo^8
!!! SPOILER ALERT !!!

The following sentence has ten hads in it. Can you puncutate it correctly? John where Mary had had had had had had had had had had been correct.