Discussion Forum (Archived)
Guest
As was discussed on today's program, "Kumbaya" is often used as an oblique epithet these days. A handle for a particular sort of naive thinking. Never mind that there is plenty of naivete to go around. It's an interesting example of the way bits of language are "captured" by partisans and used against their opponents.
It's interesting to listen to our political parties argue about exactly who is the exclusive guardian of, say, "Family Values." Or "The Environment." Or who exactly is a "Patriot."
This is nothing new. Though, in our increasingly-short-attention-span culture, it appears to be increasingly effective. I mourn the loss of nuance as the sound-bytes seem to be composed of fewer and fewer bits. It feels like our ability to communicate (pardon the digital slang) gets corrupted.
I would enjoy hearing from others who would like to find ways to shine some light on this eternal problem.
George Lakoff, yes.
Wendell Berry's essays in "Standing by Words"
The wonderful Canadian Magazines "Adbusters" and "This Magazine".
The NCTE "Doublespeak Awards"
A book about the public relations industry, "Toxic Sludge Is Good for You"
But these works and others like them are something of a niche market. I can't help wondering whether a language-oriented version of a fact-checking web site might not be in order. Just as the fact-checkers point out false claims and twisted statistics, such a site might point out examples of abuse of language. And I ain't talkin' misplaced apostrophe's. Then the questions become: Wouldn't it be great if such a site became popular and it made a real difference? Would anyone fingered have the decency to be embarrassed?
Hmmmm ... Fodder for an "English Major" episode on Prairie Home Companion. Maybe I listen to too much public radio ...
I think what you're looking for, Contrazz, is Media Matters.
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Grant Barrett
1 Guest(s)