Search
Listen on:
Follow me:
Search
Listen on:
Follow me:
Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Search
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
If need be
Guest
1
2016/02/02 - 6:09pm
Print

'If need be'  somehow sounds so wrong to me,  no matter how many times I hear it from no matter how many smart persons.  In casual contexts, it sounds like false sophistication, yet in serious contexts, it sounds like a lapse of standards.  Weird.

Guest
2
2016/02/02 - 10:39pm
Print

I see it as a contraction of "if there should be a need." It seems natural and efficient. I have no problems with it and use "if need be" often in speech and writing, both casual and formal. Get used to it. It's been around for awhile, peaking near the turn of the 20th century. Ngram.

Guest
3
2016/02/05 - 12:44am
Print

You might be right there.  I still don't like it.   It sounds most like an attempt at  double-subjunctive,  if there exist such a thing.   A much more natural way to do contraction:    if needed.

   

Guest
4
2016/02/05 - 5:52pm
Print

I grew up with if need be – doesn't get much more natural than that.

deaconB
744 Posts
(Offline)
5
2016/02/06 - 5:21am
Print

tromboniator said
I grew up with if need be – doesn't get much more natural than that.

I've been cogitating on this, and it seems to me that, especially in order texts, I've read if needs be, needs plural rather than need singular.  In my mind, that translates into "if there are such needs as require a particular action, then".

As I find increasingly often, my grey matter is full of crap.  The singular form seems to be far more popular at all times, and seems to have preceded the plural form.  I find it curious that the phrase enjoyed popularity three centuries ago, and one century ago, being much less popular today and two centuries agp. Not the slightest idea why that may be.

And if I may beg your leave, I need to take a brain laxative.  Mayhaps a single malt will do?

Guest
6
2016/02/06 - 12:51pm
Print

Single malt be just right.

Guest
7
2016/03/05 - 5:56pm
Print

An idiom that's weird but that I like: it's an adverb made up of an adjective, a preposition, and a conjunction.  As puzzle, what is it?

Guest
8
2016/03/15 - 4:13am
Print

No one picked up this puzzle because it's too easy or too hard? 

Hint- the order of the 3 words is :  preposition, conjunction, adjective.

The result is used as adverbial phrase, pretty common.

Guest
9
2016/03/15 - 11:43am
Print

By and large.

Guest
10
2016/03/15 - 4:56pm
Print

OK, I'll play too. But there's so many that fit the requirements. My guesses: "but then again" "to and fro" "so if true" ???

Guest
11
2016/03/18 - 11:09am
Print

But you didn't get the adjective in except for "So if true."  And 'so' is adverb.

I take it the parts of speech and their order in "By and large" make it pretty unique.

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 94
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Menu

Recent posts