Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
I know it's a litle late, but I'm ready for "ought-9"!
Guest
1
2008/12/02 - 1:25pm

I should made a bigger fuss about this 7 years ago, but I have been disappointed that we haven't been referring to this decade by saying things like, "I graduated in ought-4" or "My nephew was born back in ought-2". I mean, come on people! Only once every 90 years do have an opportunity to talk like this! 🙂 Maybe it will come into effect more AFTER this decade is over?--Like maybe people are waiting for it to be farther in the past before they start saying things like, "Back when Pluto was a planet, in ought-6, we walked to school in the snow, uphill both ways..."

EmmettRedd
859 Posts
(Offline)
2
2008/12/03 - 8:41am

Andyman,

Why only go part way? Call it "double-ought-9". We only get to do that every 990 years. :-/

In fact, I have been doing that since "triple-ought" (AKA Y2K). I happen to think that the James Bond franchise really missed the boat last year, '007.

Emmett

Martha Barnette
San Diego, CA
820 Posts
(Offline)
3
2008/12/03 - 10:16am

LOL. I never heard it put quite that way, guys. Time to start a campaign.

Guest
4
2008/12/03 - 7:01pm

I prefer the word naughties for the zero decade (naught = zero), and I've been so disappointed that it didn't catch on. We'd have naught eight and naught nine. Catchy, isn't it? But this late in the decade it's a moot point. They ought to call it naught!

EmmettRedd
859 Posts
(Offline)
5
2008/12/04 - 8:21am

While there is a verb form for "ought", it also has two noun forms. Here is the entry from the OED for the second one:

" A nought, zero, cipher. Freq. in oughts and crosses n. = NOUGHTS AND CROSSES n. Also fig.
The text of Ritson's Caledonian Muse (see quot. 1821) was first printed in 1785 but the whole impression was destroyed by fire.

1821 J. RITSON Caledonian Muse 175 For suredly, an owght I were To bede her taunte or cheke. "

BTW, it will be a long time before it is too late; I'll be 100 years old in ought-55. :-\\

Emmett

Guest
6
2008/12/12 - 10:13pm

Ought we sight in the 30 ought 6?

EmmettRedd
859 Posts
(Offline)
7
2008/12/14 - 1:39pm

Mine is an ought-3 Springfield.

What is yours?

Emmett

Grant Barrett
San Diego, California
1532 Posts
(Offline)
8
2008/12/15 - 3:53am

Here's another in a long line of stories about what to call this decade.

Incidentally, as we've discussed on the show before, what most people say when they're not thinking about it, is indeed "twenty oh nine" or "twenty nine." The latter works, more or less, because you're not apt to mistake "twenty nine" for "2029" since the latter year is so far off.

Guest
9
2008/12/16 - 9:16am

Maybe future generations will refer to this decade as the bimilots, "bi" for two, "mil" for thousand, and "ots" for "oughts," or zeros. More likely it will be called "the first decade of the 21st century."

JM Lermond
10
2008/12/30 - 1:44pm

I am campaigning for "twenty ought-nine" and then "twenty ten"!

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 120
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts