Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
Adore foods
Guest
1
2016/05/24 - 8:36pm

Grant and Martha were rather critical of the self appointed  Rules  Masters  who don't like foods to be adored, political causes to be campaigned on, etc. (That's on show of May 20.)

But aren't there  virtues to the instinct to spot conflations and to insist on distinctions?  -if not because it is a main drive of language itself, then as inward check on our weird and perhaps dark human psyches.

Here're but a few well worn confused terminologies that no doubt trace to human vagaries, self-centerness, drama-queenness, infantileness:

Battle cancer

Tame Nature

Assault on Mount Everest

Mount Everest  yields  but not before claiming so many lives   (This one is particularly annoying!)

What about  Adore foods ?  Could it be from the same psychic place where you conflate  Loving  a person   with   Eating them alive?  (There should be no doubt that human love has a dark side that we humans have in common with spiders, mantises, and such.  )

I always love it when a restaurant waitress calls me   sweetie-pie,  but deep down it always gets my guards up.  As it should yours too.

Guest
2
2016/05/25 - 4:05pm

RobertB said: Here’re but a few well worn confused terminologies that no doubt trace to human vagaries, self-centerness, drama-queenness, infantileness:

Well that's an interesting (but useful) contraction I haven't seen much of (here're). Works for me as "here are."

But yes, I do not like this recent tendency to anthropomorphize natural objects. It's colorful, to be sure, but I think it diminishes the meaning of strong verbs like "battle" "tame" "assault" "yields" etc. Probably OK for fiction, but I don't think it has a place in "serious" writing. Just my 2¢.

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 81
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts