Notifications
Clear all

Usage of 'but': are these forms obsolete?

7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

Hello!

I haven't seen that much of 'but' being used (in newspapers, magazines, etc) in the ways I quote below. I wonder: are these obsolete or would you still hear/read people using 'but' in these situations? (all examples are from Oxford Dictionary).

1) but = only: I don't think we'll manage it. Still, we can but try. There were a lot of famous people there: Lady Gaga and Hugh Jackman, to name but two.

2) but = except; apart from: We've had nothing but trouble with this car. The problem is anything but easy. Who but Rosa could think of something like that? Everyone was there but him.

3) but = without the (additional) circumstance that: There is no hope but through prayer (= There is no hope other than the hope of prayer) (this one is not clear to me).

It never rains but it pours (= It never rains without also pouring). No leaders ever existed but they were optimists (= No leaders existed who were not optimists; All leaders who ever existed were optimists).

4) but = that (used esp. after words like doubt, deny, etc., with a negative word like not): I don't doubt but you'll do it.

5) with the exception of: No one replied but me. Everyone but John was there.

Thank you!

Best,

Alla

6 Replies
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

Number 5 is the only one I hear and use commonly. Number 2 would not sound strange to me but I don't hear it very often. I would expect to read the rest only in literature and never hear them.  However, I am reluctant to declare that they are obsolete.

Reply
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

Hello, Dick.

Thank you for your answer. 

Reply
deaconB
Posts: 742
(@deke)
Member
Joined: 12 years ago

None of those examples sound the least bit "off" to me. 

Nut I have to say, it seems like most people use but to start off a sentence, and that's really bad, logically; If you're goint to conjoin two thoughts, it should be one sentence.  Starting off with a conjunctive makes the second 'sentence" a sentence fragment instead of a sentence.

And don't you hatte it when someone does that?  It's an insult, really, that you matter so little, they don't bother to form legitimate sentences sentences.

Reply
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago
Alla said 
... from Oxford Dictionary ...
It never rains but it pours
No leaders ever existed but they were optimist

Those 2 strike no bells for me at all, Oxford or no.  The 2nd one would've made much more sense like this:  No leaders ever existed but as optimists.

All the others above are quite common and current usages.

Reply
Page 1 / 2