Notifications
Clear all

Usage-based / Nominal Definition ... Or what would you call it?

10 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

I'm in a silly debate with a friend about a "deli" at the airport. It is called Comida Buena. The sign also says "Deli." When I mentioned it to my friend, I said that "I got a sandwich at that deli between A & B terminals." He said there isn't a deli there. The conversation went on. We made a bet and he won't pay up (in piggyback rides, not money). Now he says the definition of deli (delicatessen) involves selling cheese or meats or other semi prepared items which does not fit what this place sells (fully prepared items). Ok, I can see that, but I called it a deli bc that's what the sign says. Plus lots of people refer to sandwich shops as delis even if it doesn't fit the true definition of the word.

So, I'm trying to argue that since the sign for the place calls itself a deli, that is a functional or nominal definition of what it is. However, I am not able to support this point with the online research I've done so far. Can you help me out? Isn't there some legitimate (or semi-legitimate) term for describing how when something is named a word (eg deli) it helps define what it is?

"functional definitions" seem to be something else, as are "nominal definitions." Just Google them and you will see.

Thanks for your interest and help 🙂

 

 

 

 

 

9 Replies
Posts: 551
(@robert)
Member
Joined: 14 years ago

Ancient adage: if it quacks and waddles like a duck, then it is a duck.

But that apparently is not your choice of exhibit A. Instead, you seem to be proposing the reverse: It is a duck  if it calls itself a duck- a very hard sell I am afraid. (Not that the top-side-up argument was any model of Socrates either.)
 
There is hope though- what if a lot of people agree to call it a duck? That is, you ought to campaign to gather supports to your side (and hope that your friend will just give in out of laziness).
 
For 1 opinion, there needs to be something that can be called 'deli' beyond just a sign, because if not, is it any more 'deli' than an empty store with just a sign? and a person will be right to object.
Reply
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

Both your friend and you have a point, but I'm on your side. I also agree with Robert that the sign is only a small part of your argument.

Many years ago, delis mostly sold bulk deli products, and sandwiches were secondary. Today, the market is different. Most people who go to a deli are looking for a quick lunch.

In Manhattan there are hundreds of delis that would give you a confused look if you asked for a pound of boiled ham. While they serve deli sandwiches, they don't sell by the pound. For that, most go to the deli counter of a supermarket.

I think your friend has missed this minor shift in culture which is reflected in the usage in many regions. People in New York certainly refer to shops that sell only sandwiches made from deli products as delis. No dictionary I checked indicates that the deli products sold at a delicatessen had to be available in bulk.

Do a map search of Manhattan on deli, pick ten at random, and call to see if they sell sandwiches and if they sell by the pound. I think you will win. The cultural change (ie. supermarket shopping) has influenced a small semantic shift.

Reply
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

"But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

- Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass

Reply
Posts: 0
Guest
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago

dilettante said Carroll said Humpty said: "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

I used similar reasoning when I needed to construct the term hemispherian   (one who lives in a particular hemisphere, north or south). See this thread. But unlike Humpty, at least I was working within logical linguistic guidelines. And I believe that's what Heather was looking for when she started this thread. The word deli   has no doubt evolved in the manner described by Glenn. Here in Phoenix AZ I know of only one deli that sells both meals and bulk foodstuff ... and it's a traditional Jewish deli that's been in business for over 30 years.

Robert also makes a good point about labels vs. "things they label." Brings to mind Magritte's famous "Ceci n'est pas une pipe" painting.

So I guess I'd have to come come down on the side of usage-based definitions, at least in the case of deli.

Reply
Page 1 / 2