After a long run
Old habits won't die easy- I have to take issue with Grant's topic name, "After a long run, we will close this discussion forum."
A long run? Β Which one? Β Are there some other Β ones more obviously at issue than this very one? Β That's Β what Β A means, right? Β -one among many.
Grant and Martha, you're one pair of linguist aces- tremendous works you've been doing to educate and entertain us public. Β I Iook forward to listening to your new shows. Β I'll go to your Facebook Β site now.
Funny how you say or hear something in passing, and not long after, run into materials that appear to be direct Β talkback Β to you.
Here's a case of philosopher caught by fellow philosopher switching articles : Β Noam Chomsky discussed how intellectuals used to blame the Soviets for being the one-sided cause of the Cold War; Β then later, under pressures from more liberal waves of thinking, Β modified that view.
As example, Chomsky cited John Galbraith switching , between 1967 and 1971, Β the article Β The Β to Β A, in this passage by Galbraith:
the revolutionary and national aspirations of the Soviets ... were Β Β the / an Β undoubted historical source [of the cold war]
The change to Β An Β apparently was made to accommodate the new thinking that includes more complex causes of the Cold War, including belligerency by the US.
It may seem whatever retentive. Β But it is a good thing that these guys were that meticulous and that sharp-eyed. Β TheΒ reading public should want noΒ less of the current crops of thinkers. Β Though that could be too much to ask.