Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
Your stupid!
Guest
1
2011/03/13 - 9:06am

This sentence is one of my favorite things about the internet. I see it often and sometimes have it directed toward me. It's one of the few times I don't feel guilty about being a stickler.

Is there a term for this? If not, do you have suggestions?

Self-reference is already taken. "Takes one to know one" is close. But, that phrase implicates both parties. If the recipient catches the mistake, the insult is reversed.

It's more like blaming someone for something you did when the person saw you do it. They can be smug while you are complaining. But in this case, the act of complaining is the offense.

I'm trying to remember a variation of the sticks and stones saying. It's something about the words coming back and sticking to you.

A) Is there a term for this?
B) If not, what ideas do you have?
C) Does anybody remember the non-sticks-and-stones saying?

Guest
2
2011/03/13 - 11:21am

First, the sticky saying I remember from my youth is:
"I'm rubber; you're glue: that bounces off me and sticks to you."

As for retorts in such situations as you describe, I find silence is the best revenge. Any good parry is as wasted as proverbial pearls. Unless there is an appreciative audience, that is. Even so, you risk wallowing with the offender if you respond. How much sweeter to let the fool remain in ignorance — and that fate is more damaging than any retort I can think of.

Guest
3
2011/03/15 - 12:11pm

I agree with what Glenn had to say about the best retort is generally silence. "Don't wrestle with pigs in the mud; you'll just get dirty and they love it."

It sounds kind of like you are describing Muphry's [sic] law (aka Hartman's Law of Prescriptivist Retaliation). It's something along the line of: as the level of self-righteous indignation and pedantry rises, so does the probability of making the same or stupider error during correction.

edit: formatting

Guest
4
2011/03/23 - 3:59pm

A word or phrase that possesses the property it describes is an autological word or phrase. "Sesquipedalianism" and "a mispelled word" are examples of each.

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 73
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts