Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
Plural possessive
Guest
1
2010/07/22 - 9:47pm

It seems that the local plural possessive term for a thing owned by us and referred to by them is "Your guys' (pron: your guyses). Example:
"I like this car! Is it your guys'?"
Is this happening everywhere?

-BT

Guest
2
2010/07/22 - 9:56pm

OK, I'm a newbie and I don't know if my post went up, or in any direction. So I'll ask a more important question in reply and see if anyone sees it.

Why do we now have an extra "is" in phrases like "the thing is.." or "The fact of the matter is…"?
These words used to be followed by the thing the speaker believed to be true, but recently the speaker has added an extra "is". "The thing is, is that…" or "The fact of the matter IS, is etc)". What IS it with this idiot IS?

E.B. White wrote about "the idiot "please". What can we do about the idiot "is"?

Barry Thorpe

Ron Draney
721 Posts
(Offline)
3
2010/07/23 - 12:39am

Are you sure that the "idiot 'is'" isn't something else? While I'm sure some people use it the way you describe, it usually turns out that the actual sentence is something like "What the fact of the matter is is that kittens are adorable". The first of those two "is"s is part of the subordinate clause functioning as the subject of the overall sentence; turn it around to get "That kittens are adorable is what the fact of the matter is" and it may be clearer that it's not just a kind of stutter.

Guest
4
2010/07/23 - 3:31am

The question is "Is 'is' being doubled ungrammatically?" What my opinion is is that radioso's observation and concern are on target. Many people have made the same observation and share the concern or, at least, interest. There are academic studies of this growing pattern. Some of the terms used to describe it are "isis," "double be," "extris" (extra is, of which isis is a subtype), "reduplicative copula," and "double copula" (copula doubling, doubled copula, etc., not to be confused with a "double cupola" -- see image below). Now we can add, albeit subjectively, "the idiot is."

It is not that the listeners are missing the "what" that is spoken. And it is not merely a stammering repetition of the copula (see the second link below "ISIS …"). It occurs in writing often enough to prove it is not a speech or hearing problem. The doubling often comes before that and is not always the same form of the verb to be.

"The problem is is that …"
"The question is is that … "
"The best thing was is that …"
"My favorite part is is that …"
Etc.

Reduplicative Copula Is Is
ISIS: It's Not Disfluent, but How Do We Know That?
Extris, extris

Double Cupola

Guest
5
2010/08/21 - 11:28pm

Ron, you're right that "is" can be doubled correctly, but Radioso is right too; more and more commonly, people are saying "The thing is is that I just hate it when...". I first noticed it a few decades ago and it's been growing more frequent. My own theory is that it started with people saying "The thing is.... [pause for thought] ...is that I just hate it when...". But it's grown far beyond that initial reasonable explanation; they're everywhere, they're everywhere!

torpeau
Left coast of FL
97 Posts
(Offline)
6
2010/08/22 - 10:39am

Radioso said:

It seems that the local plural possessive term for a thing owned by us and referred to by them is "Your guys' (pron: your guyses). Example:
"I like this car! Is it your guys'?"
Is this happening everywhere?

-BT


I have heard "your guys'" before. Waitresses frequently call male/female couples "guys" nowadays.

BTW, I would not add an "es" to the pronunciation of "guys'."

Guest
7
2010/08/22 - 12:05pm

I know some think of "guys" as exclusively male, and obviously in the phrase "guys and gals" it is. But it's handy for an informal form of address, so I say "you guys" to a mixed audience about half the time, myself.

Not sure what the possessive form would be, though; I'd never, ever say "your guys", which after all means "the guys pertaining to you". I'd probably work around it, saying "I like this car; does it belong to you guys?", or, more likely, "...Does it belong to y'all?". But then, if I use "y'all" I can equally well ask "...Is it y'all's?".

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 73
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts