Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
gazump
Guest
1
2011/10/23 - 8:02am

Interesting info on the meaning of "gazump." I knew a fellow in the Navy years ago who was known for his colorful language, idioms and metaphors. He used gazump as "up the gazump stump," as one might say "he has money up the wazoo."

He also used "goddammit" as a noun, replacing "whatchamacallit," and many more I couldn't use on-line.

sandorm
Brussels, Belgium
34 Posts
(Offline)
2
2011/11/03 - 2:37pm

I have no idea of the origin, but the only way I've heard it used, and unfortunately quite frequently, is in the UK in the context of trying to buy a house but being outbid by someone else. That is, someone already put in a verbal offer for a house, then along comes another buyer and, before the paperwork is signed, offers a higher price because he or she really wants the house. The original bidder loses the deal, but perhaps has already sold his or her own house, and so is left high and dry. He has been gazumped (spelling?) and the seller, who backed out of the lower bid, is the gazumper. Would you believe they even offer "gazumping insurance" to protect in such an event?

jock123
17 Posts
(Offline)
3
2012/07/16 - 10:33am

The way to get round that is to sell your house under Scots Law, rather than English Law (you can choose to do so anywhere in the U.K.), as offers are final in Scotland, so gazzumping cannot happen. The downside is you have to be able to persuade the seller to sell it to you that way, which might not be easy…!

Guest
4
2012/07/16 - 4:41pm

Jock123, in the US oral contracts are as binding as written ones.   Most people believe otherwise, because the difficulty with an oral contract is establishing its terms, or indeed that it even exists; in practice, therefore, a civil jury cannot be depended upon to decide correctly which version of the contract to enforce, if the witnesses disagree.   Thus the widespread but mistaken conviction that oral contracts are nonbinding.   What I'm wondering is how they resolve that problem under Scots law?

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 87
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts