Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
FAQ vs FAQs
Guest
1
2012/11/09 - 1:55pm

Does anyone have an *authoritative citation* (I'm sure we all have opinion) on the appropriate spelling of the initialism for Frequently Asked Questions?

 

I know the initial use was A) a collection of question*S* (ie, >1), and B) was a single collection. And so the plurality of the questions was subsumed within the TLA.

 

But common usage nowadays is to tack on the pluralizing "s", despite "Questions" already being plural.  Has this reached such a critical mass, so as to now being acceptable? (Does AP/Chicago/anyone voice in on this?)

 

Personally, I enjoy this about as much as "ATM machine" (or any of the others), but looking for some pronouncement on the acceptability of this practice.

 

BONUS QUESTION: How does one refer to a collection of collections when the trailing word already has pluralization? Isn't common behavior to drop the second pluralization?? (I can't recall right now.) Or then does that not communicate the higher order collection? So would it be correct to refer to a collection of multiple FAQ as FAQs?

 

If so, how does one pronounce that in non-innitialized form? If anyone says "Frequently Asked Questionses" I'm gonna hafta punch you.

 

Thanks for any help!

PS. Dawns on me typing this that I did call this an initialism, but I think common parlance among teh interwebs n00bs would be to use this as an  acronym. [For purposes of discussion, n00b would be defined as anyone joining teh intertubes after Permanent September.] Usage as an acronym I believe thus further reinforces the inclination to append the redundant "s'.  

EmmettRedd
859 Posts
(Offline)
2
2012/11/09 - 2:31pm

You might not get much 'authoritive' here, but there are two old threads: RBI" and ...RsBI... which discusses plurals in initialisms.

Enjoy.

Emmett

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 97
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts