Discussion Forum (Archived)
Guest
We have just recently had a discussion on this: Plurals for last names
There are differences of opinion. In my speaking and writing it would be Lemonses, just as you suggest.
If I had invited the late Jack Lemmon and his wife, I would have invited the Lemmons. But when I invite Brent and Whitney Lemons, I will have invited the Lemonses. I hear that Lemmon's wife was charming, and I am certain Lemons's wife is equally engaging. I hope one day to be invited to the Lemonses' house. Sadly, it is too late for me to be invited to the Lemmons' house.
I agree that's the most common usage for plurals. We should add that any surname ending in any sibilant (s, x, ch, sh, or z) would also follow this rule. For example, I would address a letter to the Schultz family as to "The Schultzes."
Where I often get confused is with possessive corporate or team names. Like, How would you refer to the "Green Bay Packers" (a collective proper noun) in a possessive form? I'd probably go with "Packers'" but I'm not completely sure this is correct. And if it is, would it be pronounced "packers-iz" ???
I agree with Glenn completely on how to form the plural. I always simply think about how I would distinguish in speech between one Lemons and more than one Lemons. The correct answer, as Glenn stated, is that, if there is more than one person whose last name is "Lemons", they are collectively "Lemonses". Of course, in conversation it will always sound singular, because pronouncing "Lemonses" (LE-mun-ziz) is a little awkward, though not prohibitively so.
Anyway, I posted to respond to Heimhenge. The proper pronunciation for either Green Bay Packers or Packers fans is "losers". It's a difficult phonetic stretch, but any Vikes fan (born in Milwaukee but raised in Edina, Minn.) would agree. . . . On the linguistic note, the term "Packers" is not plural; it is the name of a singular collective. So, strictly, it should be the "Packers's" and it should sound like it looks.
I am obsessed with the oddly regular plural form of the team Maple Leafs. Only in America! Oh, wait … .
Sports team names are ver problematic, and official style guides differ in their standards.
In most common usage, people would not consider the team names as singular collectives when they are plural in form. When people commonly call a lone member of the team by the singular form (e.g. Packer, Yankee, Met, Angel, Red Skin) they would also treat the team name as a true plural.
Then there are the Utah Jazz, the Boston Red Sox, etc., where one is forced into treating the team name as a collective.
For all names, personal, team, or corporate, I would defer to their wishes. In general, corporations that end with a possessive remain unchanged. (e.g. Standard & Poor's announced today that … . In Standard and Poor's announcement, the economic implications of these ruling are detailed … .)
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Grant Barrett
1 Guest(s)