Home » Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

A Way with Words, a radio show and podcast about language and linguistics.

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
Being "in the tank" for a candidate
Guest
1
2008/10/22 - 12:39pm

I wanted to see if anyone knew the origin of the phrase "in the tank" when used in a political context. Every once in a while, I hear people complain that a media organization (or the media in general) is "in the tank" for a political candidate, and I became curious about that expression since I can't remember anyone using it before this election. It seems to have a fairly negative connotation, and describing a person or organization as being "in the tank" for a candidate seems to indicate unfair bias rather than just support.

Does anyone have any information about the origins of this expression? Is it ever used outside of the realm of politics? What kind of "tank" is being referred to?

Grant Barrett
San Diego, California
1532 Posts
(Offline)
2
2008/10/22 - 12:51pm

Funny you should ask. A reporter asked me about this yesterday. This is what I sent her:

There is an old slang term "tank town," or just "a tank," which referred to one-horse towns or whistlestops, the kinds of places that don't have much to remark upon except the town water tank or water tower. These are the kinds of places that boxers would fight on tours. These were not necessarily sanctioned bouts but perhaps a bit more orchestrated, where you might have the same boxers fighting eaach other week after week, in town after town, with the same predictable results, much like professional wresting is done today.

Related to "tank," boxing has had several meanings of "to dive." It can meaning being knocked to the canvas, or intentionally throwing a bout--letting yourself lose. The same for "flop"--besides meaning a knock-down, it could, as early as 1907, also mean to fake being knocked out or to throw a fight. (By 1919 "flop" was used by Variety to describe failures in Hollywood--it is highly likely that use comes from boxing.)

From those earlier "tanks," it is highly likely that we get both "go into the tank" and "take a dive," which show up in boxing in the 1930s. By the mid- to late 1930s, to do a "tank job" also meant "to take a dive"--that is, to throw a match. Even further, by the mid 1950s uses of "go into the water"--meaning "to tank"--show up.

As time has passed, "to go into the tank" or "to tank" has come to almost always mean to fail unintentionally, while "to take a dive" has come to almost always mean to fail intentionally.

Now, where does "to be in the tank for someone" come in? Judging from the evidence I have seen, it's a simple outgrowth of the older forms. "To be in the tank" for someone means that you're working on their behalf, usually with connotations of secrecy, backroom deals, and sly manipulation. Those are the same kind of devious acts which would characterize a boxer throwing a match on behalf of someone else.

Forum Timezone: UTC -7
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
A Conversation with Dr Astein Osei
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1268
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 50
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)